New England Surgical Society (NESS)
Search NESS
  Home
  Annual Meeting
  Annual Resident and Fellow Research Day
  Members
      Member Directory
      Members Only
  Scholars Foundation
  Job Board
  Awards
  Journal of the American College of Surgeons
  Newsletters
  Committees
  Contact NESS

NESS 2006 Annual Meeting
Back to Scientific Program
Back to Annual Meeting


Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: Experience at a Community Hospital
Jeremiah T Martin, John A Federico, Alicia A McKelvey, Kristina Spate, Thomas Fabian
Hospital of St. Raphael, New Haven, CT

Objective: Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) is gaining increasing popularity as a modality for esophagegeal resection in patients with both elective and emergent indications. We report the experience of a single thoracic group converting from open to a minimally invasive approach, and hypothesize that the results and efficacy would be similar for both procedures.
Design: A retrospective chart review was carried out comparing 17 consecutive patients who underwent a minimally invasive esophagectomy with 38 patients who underwent an open procedure during the prior 4 years.
Setting: Community Hospital
Main Outcome Measures: Hospital length of stay, 30-day mortality, complications and nutritional status on discharge.
Results: Both groups had similar age distribution (means of 67, MIE vs. 63, open) and pathology (adenocarcinoma in 70% MIE vs. 61% open). MIE was performed in one patient for perforation during a diagnostic procedure. Average length of stay was significantly shorter in MIE patients (12 days vs. 21 days). 30-day mortality rate was lower in MIE patients (6% vs. 11%). Postoperative atrial fibrillation was more common in MIE (24%) when compared with open (8%) however postoperative respiratory complications was far less likely in MIE (pneumonia 6%, respiratory failure 18%) when compared with open (pneumonia 16%, respiratory failure 27%). No significant difference in leak rate was noted. A more rapid recovery was noted in MIE patients with tube feedings required in 6% of discharges, compared with 18% of patients undergoing an open procedure.
Conclusions: Minimally invasive esophagectomy has distinct advantages over open procedures in terms of patient recovery. As evidenced by our experience, MIE can safely be adopted by surgeons experienced in open esophagectomy and applied with comparable outcomes.


Back to Scientific Program
Back to Annual Meeting

Copyright © 2018 New England Surgical Society. All Rights Reserved.
Read Privacy Policy.