New England Surgical Society (NESS)
Search NESS
 Home
 Annual Meeting
 Annual Resident and Fellow Research Day
 Members
     Member Directory
     Members Only
 Charitable Foundation
 Archives of Surgery
 Newsletters
 Committees
 Contact NESS

 

Archives of Surgery
Current Issue
Journal Home

90th Annual Meeting Abstracts


A Move to the Right? The Viability of Alternatives to Colonoscopy
*Mark Y Sun, MD, *Samantha L Pugsley, BS, *Jessica P Simons, MD, Jennifer F. Tseng, MD, *Justin A Maykel, MD, *William B Sweeney, MD, *Karim Alavi, MD
University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA

Purpose: In 1995, the US Preventative Services Task Force recommended commencing screening for colon cancer at age 50 for average-risk people; however, the type of screening method remains controversial. Alternatives to colonoscopy include flexible sigmoidoscopy, which does not evaluate the right colon, and CT colonography, which does not detect lesions <1 cm accurately. The aim of this study was to use a prospective database to determine whether flexible sigmoidoscopy and CT colonography would be viable alternatives to colonoscopy in the current era.
Methods: Using a prospective endoscopy database at a single academic medical center, 1964 consecutive adult patients having undergone a screening colonoscopy from 1/1/2007 - 10/19/2007 were identified. Basic demographic data along with polyp location, size and pathology were collected. Patients with a family history of colon cancer, previously documented polyps, or inflammatory bowel disease were excluded.
Results: Mean [±SD] age was 58.0±7.6 years; 49.9% were male. Polyps were present in 647 cases(32.9%), with adenomatous polyps accounting for 389 (62.5% of retrieved polyps). Of adenomatous polyps, 273 (70.2%) measured 0.1-0.49cm, 101 (26.0%) measured 0.5-0.99cm, 8 (2.0%) measured 1.0-1.49cm, and 7 (1.8%) measured >1.5cm. Right-sided (proximal to the splenic flexure) adenomas accounted for 192 (48.2%) cases. Of these, 186 (96.9%) polyps were <1 cm and the majority were tubular adenomas (93.6%).
Conclusion: Colonoscopy remains the most effective means of screening for colonic neoplasia. Flexible sigmoidoscopy appears insufficient as 48.2% of adenomatous lesions are found proximal to the splenic flexure. CT colonography would also have difficulty detecting the vast majority of adenomatous polyps as >96% of polyps measured less than 1cm and >70% of polyps measured less than 0.5cm.


 

Copyright © 2010 New England Surgical Society. All Rights Reserved.
Read Privacy Policy.