New England Surgical Society (NESS)
Search NESS
  Home
  Annual Meeting
  Annual Resident and Fellow Research Day
  Members
      Member Directory
      Members Only
  Scholars Foundation
  Job Board
  Awards
  Journal of the American College of Surgeons
  Newsletters
  Committees
  Contact NESS

2010 Annual Meeting Abstracts

Back to Program


Late Adhesiolysis For Adhesive Bowel Obstruction (ABO) Is Safe But Increases Post-Operative Length of Stay and In-hospital Cost Compared To Early Adhesiolysis: A Nationwide Analysis of Inpatient Outcomes.
*Daniel I Chu, *Jeremy T. Hetzel, *Melanie L. Gainsbury, *Lauren A. Howard, *Arthur F. Stucchi, James M. Becker
Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA

Objective: To compare the clinical and cost outcome for patients undergoing early vs. late adhesiolysis for ABOs in a nationwide, representative inpatient database.
Design: Patients undergoing adhesiolysis for ABO were identified from the 2007 National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database and stratified to early (<=2days from admission) vs. late (>2d) adhesiolysis before undergoing outcome analysis.
Setting: The 2007 NIS is the largest publicly-available inpatient database sponsored by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) as part of the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP). The NIS represents a 20-percent stratified sample of inpatients from all U.S. community hospitals.
Patients: From 8,034,632 patients included in the 2007 NIS, 5,454 patients were identified who underwent adhesiolysis for ABO.
Interventions: No interventions.
Outcome: The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality and secondarily all post-operative complications (POC), length of stay (LOS), post-operative LOS (PLOS) and in-hospital cost.
Results: From 5,454 patients who underwent adhesiolysis for ABO, 53.2% and 46.8% underwent early vs. late adhesiolysis, respectively. Early adhesiolysis patients were younger (60.1 vs. 65.0yrs, p<0.001), more privately insured (41.5 vs. 34.0%, p<0.001) and had 13 co-morbidities with lower frequencies compared to late adhesiolysis patients (p<0.05). After covariate adjustment with multivariable regression models, no difference in mortality or POC was observed between early vs. late adhesiolysis (odds ratio[OR]=1.05, p=0.10 and OR=1.02, p=0.16, respectively). LOS and PLOS were reduced by 4.13 and 0.53 days, respectively, with early vs. late adhesiolysis (p<0.001). In-hospital cost increased by $19,409 dollars for each patient undergoing late vs. early adhesiolysis (p<0.001).
Conclusions: This nationwide study shows that while it may be safe to delay surgery for patients with ABO, late adhesiolysis significantly increases PLOS and in-hospital cost.


Back to Program

 

Copyright © 2018 New England Surgical Society. All Rights Reserved.
Read Privacy Policy.